🔗 Share this article

The last time Vladimir Putin traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the international order was markedly different. The brief visit, limited by the global health crisis, centered around discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Not long after, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his overseas engagements.

Furthermore, that era came before a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory rhetoric and the imposition of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the importance of this diplomatic mission to meet Modi cannot be overstated, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a rejection of outside coercion," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a delicate moment. President Putin comes after rejecting latest diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the key significance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to a form of routine global diplomacy."

For India, the risks are even higher. The country faces a challenging international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a joint opinion piece criticizing Russia's peace efforts. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate interference.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Soviet period and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's top arms provider. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West until a change in approach.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of cheap energy from Russia. However, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, accusations mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in US-India ties.

"Consequently, India has reverted to its default strategy of maintaining multiple options," noted a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "Beijing continues to be the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, decreasing its reliance on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in the past few years.

"Delhi will try to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but not become overly reliant that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced trade relations is likely to be a key agenda item. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of energy imports remains central. While the Indian government has vowed to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has moved to increase imports of US energy.

A Russian official admitted "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" drops and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Limited Leverage on Ukraine

As talks proceed, the topic of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, India lacks the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the conflict," the analyst noted. "Aside from urging negotiations, its capacity to make a difference is constrained."

Ultimately, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by national interest in a rapidly changing world.